A year in research · 30 selected publications · five research threads
In 2018, we showed that control depends on where a conflict starts, what information it contains and which person or brain state has to resolve it.
Across pharmacology, development and clinical neuroscience, the year's work replaced broad labels such as inhibition or flexibility with a more precise question: which processing stage is being changed?
01 · MECHANISMS
Catecholamine-related interventions did not improve every kind of control equally. Methylphenidate and tyrosine benefited particular conflicts, while dopamine changed sensory evidence accumulation in a dose- and signal-dependent way.[1,2,3] Auditory work likewise showed that methylphenidate was most helpful when perceptual salience and attentional goals strongly disagreed.[4]
Emotional context affected late conflict resolution more than early attentional selection, and previous conflict made angry faces especially difficult to integrate.[5,6] Conscious and subliminal distractors also diverged: hangover increased processing of subliminal information, and adverse effects of control reflected whether implicit contingencies could be integrated into the active task representation.[7,8]
In plain terms: Neuromodulation and context act on particular information-processing operations, not on one all-purpose control faculty.
02 · INHIBITION
Response inhibition differed between adolescents and adults partly because sensory processing differed.[9] Decomposing the EEG revealed separate stimulus and response-selection codes when controlled stopping interacted with automatic tendencies.[10] The organization of somatosensory areas mattered less than their connection patterns for subsequent motor control.[11]
Causal stimulation supplied a striking demonstration: altering early sensory gain could reduce the later demand on the inhibition network.[12] Machine learning then found theta- and alpha-band features between familiar N2 and P3 markers that predicted stopping performance with about 78 percent accuracy.[13]
In plain terms: A successful stop is prepared by sensory selection and evidence processing before the final inhibitory response is visible.
03 · DEVELOPMENT AND STATE
Accounting for trial-to-trial neural variability uncovered different inhibition networks in children and adults and made treatment effects in ADHD more reliable.[14,15] In adolescent ADHD, the content of multisensory input and a narrowed temporal integration window explained difficulties with complex inhibition and multi-component action.[16,17] Interval timing further separated inattentive and combined ADHD presentations.[18]
Fatigue selectively disrupted response recoding when switching depended on working memory, and high-dose alcohol produced a similarly conditional impairment rather than a global loss of flexibility.[19,20] In restless legs syndrome, better evening performance arose from diminished visuomotor priming.[21]
In plain terms: Age, fatigue and treatment can change the timing and variability of a process even when average behaviour looks similar.
04 · CLINICAL CONTRASTS
In Tourette syndrome, plasticity in supplementary-motor-to-motor pathways was normal, while prediction violations recruited anterior cingulate cortex more strongly.[22,23] Striatal microstructure offered a complementary explanation of how striosomes can shape the interaction between conscious and subliminal conflict.[24,25]
Adolescents with OCD sometimes became more flexible when repetitive task sets made relevant perceptual information easier to select.[26] In autism, basic switching was preserved without added memory load, while repetitive behaviour increased with that load.[27] These contrasts prevented broad clinical labels from being mistaken for uniform cognitive deficits.
In plain terms: Clinical conditions alter selected routes through the control system; preserved processes are as informative as impaired ones.
05 · ADAPTATION AND BIOLOGY
People who adapted well to changing demands were especially able to downregulate control and automatize responses when the task became easy.[28] Phasic norepinephrine supported switching through parietal processes without changing every component of the switch itself.[29]
A multimodal study linked faster auditory-speech processing to denser neurites in the planum temporale, connecting microstructure to millisecond-scale function.[30] Across the year's studies, efficient behaviour emerged from matching biological gain, network organization and processing strategy to the information actually present.
In plain terms: Adaptive control is selective and economical: it amplifies, integrates or releases control according to current demands.
The 2018 research made specificity the organizing principle. By separating sensory, representational and response-related stages, it explained why the same task can recruit different mechanisms across development, clinical groups and brain states.
Curated from PubMed records returned for Beste C[au] in 2018. Citation numbers in the story link to entries below. DOI links open the publisher landing page; PubMed links open the indexed record.
Bensmann W, Roessner V, Stock AK, Beste C. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;21(10):901-909.
DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy063 · PubMed
Stock AK, Colzato L, Beste C. European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;28(8):933-944.
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.010 · PubMed
Beste C, Adelhöfer N, Gohil K, Passow S, Roessner V, Li SC. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;21(7):649-655.
DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy019 · PubMed
Adelhöfer N, Gohil K, Passow S, Teufert B, Roessner V, Li SC, Beste C. Human brain mapping. 2018;39(12):5050-5061.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24344 · PubMed
Schreiter ML, Chmielewski WX, Beste C. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience. 2018;18(3):521-535.
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0585-5 · PubMed
Schreiter ML, Chmielewski W, Beste C. NeuroImage. 2018;174:11-21.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.017 · PubMed
Zink N, Bensmann W, Beste C, Stock AK. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2018;12:316.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00316 · PubMed
Zink N, Stock AK, Colzato L, Beste C. Brain structure & function. 2018;223(7):3347-3363.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-018-1694-1 · PubMed
Bodmer B, Friedrich J, Roessner V, Beste C. Developmental cognitive neuroscience. 2018;31:35-45.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.008 · PubMed
Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Beste C. Human brain mapping. 2018;39(4):1839-1849.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23974 · PubMed
Friedrich J, Mückschel M, Beste C. Brain structure & function. 2018;223(2):687-699.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1515-y · PubMed
Friedrich J, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):17486.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35879-2 · PubMed
Vahid A, Mückschel M, Neuhaus A, Stock AK, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):16235.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34727-7 · PubMed
Bodmer B, Mückschel M, Roessner V, Beste C. Brain structure & function. 2018;223(4):1797-1810.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1589-6 · PubMed
Bluschke A, Friedrich J, Schreiter ML, Roessner V, Beste C. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2018;20:1191-1203.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.027 · PubMed
Chmielewski WX, Tiedt A, Bluschke A, Dippel G, Roessner V, Beste C. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2018;19:527-537.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.019 · PubMed
Bluschke A, Gohil K, Petzold M, Roessner V, Beste C. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2018;18:533-542.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.024 · PubMed
Bluschke A, Schuster J, Roessner V, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):2033.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20484-0 · PubMed
Petruo VA, Mückschel M, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):6395.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24834-w · PubMed
Wolff N, Gussek P, Stock AK, Beste C. Addiction biology. 2018;23(1):503-514.
DOI: 10.1111/adb.12470 · PubMed
Zhang R, Schrempf W, Brandt MD, Mückschel M, Beste C, Stock AK. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2018;129(1):112-121.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.022 · PubMed
Tübing J, Gigla B, Brandt VC, Verrel J, et al.. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):11984.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30504-8 · PubMed
Buse J, Beste C, Roessner V. The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry. 2018;19(2):130-141.
DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2016.1274052 · PubMed
Beste C, Moll CKE, Pötter-Nerger M, Münchau A. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2018;22(9):747-751.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.007 · PubMed
Beste C, Mückschel M, Rosales R, Domingo A, et al.. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). 2018;28(7):2243-2252.
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx125 · PubMed
Wolff N, Giller F, Buse J, Roessner V, Beste C. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. 2018;59(9):1024-1032.
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12901 · PubMed
Wolff N, Chmielewski WX, Beste C, Roessner V. The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry. 2018;19(7):509-520.
DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2017.1296973 · PubMed
Zink N, Stock AK, Vahid A, Beste C. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2018;12:411.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00411 · PubMed
Wolff N, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C. Brain structure & function. 2018;223(2):925-940.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1531-y · PubMed
Ocklenburg S, Friedrich P, Fraenz C, Schlüter C, Beste C, Güntürkün O, Genç E. Science advances. 2018;4(7):eaar6830.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar6830 · PubMed