A year in research · 28 selected publications · five research threads
In 2017, we traced cognitive control back to the sensory codes, bodily signals and neuromodulatory systems that prepare an action.
The studies showed that inhibition and multitasking are shaped before the final response: by modality, multimodal integration, prediction, working memory and norepinephrine-related preparation.
01 · INFORMATION CODES
Theta oscillations in prefrontal cortex carried separable stimulus and response codes during the inhibition of automatic actions.[1] Pupil-linked and EEG measures showed that norepinephrine-related activity was strongest for motor-response information and prepared control when inhibition was unlikely or multi-component demands might arise.[2,3,4] Working-memory load recruited norepinephrine-sensitive right frontal processes during stopping.[5]
Blocking, usually studied in conditioning, also changed medial-frontal response selection in goal-directed behaviour.[6] Automatic response tendencies could paradoxically make stopping more accurate by increasing cingulate conflict monitoring.[7]
In plain terms: The brain does not broadcast one generic control signal; it represents stimuli, decisions and motor responses with partly distinct dynamics.
02 · SENSORY FOUNDATIONS
The network supporting response inhibition depended on whether information arrived through vision or audition.[8] Somatosensory lateral inhibition affected later motor stopping, especially when information had to cross hemispheres.[9] Multimodal integration changed multitasking through premotor and visual-association regions, and helped explain developmental differences between children and adults.[10,11]
These findings were not confined to the laboratory. Changing proprioceptive information reversed some effects of alcohol on response control, while circadian impairment in restless legs syndrome arose from early visual selection rather than later conflict monitoring.[12,13]
In plain terms: Executive performance cannot be understood independently of the sensory and bodily information on which it operates.
03 · FLEXIBLE TASK SETS
Temporal decomposition localized memory- and cue-based switching differences to updating internal response-selection representations in inferior parietal cortex.[14] More efficient reactive switching was associated with a more small-world-like alpha network.[15] In OCD, extra working-memory demand exposed difficulties in perceptual categorization and task-set updating.[16] In inflammatory bowel disease, similar behavioural inflexibility reflected overtaxed neural circuits.[17]
A neurotoxicology translation study found that manganese-exposed welders did not show impaired flexibility or multitasking despite differences in an EEG marker.[18] That negative result underscored why behaviour and physiology must be interpreted together.
In plain terms: Switching depends on updating an internal task representation, and physiological differences do not automatically imply functional impairment.
04 · CLINICAL MECHANISMS
ADHD was marked by weak shielding of task goals against both conscious and subliminal conflict; accounting for intra-individual variability also revealed differences between inattentive and combined presentations.[19,20] ADD and neurofibromatosis type 1 could look clinically similar while showing different inhibitory physiology, and NF1 used a different route to successful conflict performance.[21,22]
Tourette syndrome showed enhanced integration in multi-component behaviour, possibly related to long-term tic control or frontostriatal connectivity.[23] Striosomal dysfunction in X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism unexpectedly improved perceptual decisions under distraction by reducing predictive interference.[24]
In plain terms: Behavioural resemblance is not mechanistic identity; distinct neural strategies can lead to the same score or symptom.
05 · STATE AND INTERVENTION
Binge-like intoxication reduced the efficiency of evidence accumulation, yet the following hangover increased it.[25] Alcohol also increased consciously perceived conflict while reducing subliminal conflict, indicating less attention to weak signals rather than a unitary control deficit.[26] Reward processing in latent toxoplasmosis was altered through additional resource allocation.[27]
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation causally improved recognition of easily decoded facial emotions, linking bodily neuromodulation to social perception.[28] Together these studies showed that the direction of an effect depends on task content, salience and current physiological state.
In plain terms: The same biological manipulation can help one operation and harm another, so mechanism and context must be specified together.
The 2017 work placed sensory coding and neuromodulatory preparation at the heart of action control. It also demonstrated why clinical and state effects must be localized within a processing cascade instead of summarized as globally better or worse control.
Curated from PubMed records returned for Beste C[au] in 2017. Citation numbers in the story link to entries below. DOI links open the publisher landing page; PubMed links open the indexed record.
Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C. Human brain mapping. 2017;38(11):5681-5690.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23757 · PubMed
Mückschel M, Chmielewski W, Ziemssen T, Beste C. NeuroImage. 2017;149:44-52.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.036 · PubMed
Dippel G, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C. NeuroImage. 2017;157:575-585.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.037 · PubMed
Mückschel M, Gohil K, Ziemssen T, Beste C. NeuroImage. 2017;146:1062-1070.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.007 · PubMed
Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C. Human brain mapping. 2017;38(1):68-81.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23344 · PubMed
Stock AK, Gohil K, Beste C. Brain structure & function. 2017;222(6):2807-2818.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1373-7 · PubMed
Chmielewski WX, Beste C. NeuroImage. 2017;146:1149-1156.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.015 · PubMed
Bodmer B, Beste C. Human brain mapping. 2017;38(4):1941-1951.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23495 · PubMed
Friedrich J, Mückschel M, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):4454.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04887-z · PubMed
Stock AK, Gohil K, Huster RJ, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):4927.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04828-w · PubMed
Gohil K, Bluschke A, Roessner V, Stock AK, Beste C. Human brain mapping. 2017;38(10):4933-4945.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23705 · PubMed
Stock AK, Mückschel M, Beste C. Addiction biology. 2017;22(1):246-256.
DOI: 10.1111/adb.12296 · PubMed
Zhang R, Brandt MD, Schrempf W, Beste C, Stock AK. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2017;15:644-652.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.018 · PubMed
Wolff N, Mückschel M, Beste C. Brain structure & function. 2017;222(8):3819-3831.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1437-8 · PubMed
Wolff N, Zink N, Stock AK, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):13910.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14490-x · PubMed
Wolff N, Buse J, Tost J, Roessner V, Beste C. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. 2017;58(8):939-949.
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12733 · PubMed
Petruo VA, Zeißig S, Schmelz R, Hampe J, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):13943.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14345-5 · PubMed
van Thriel C, Quetscher C, Pesch B, Lotz A, et al.. Archives of toxicology. 2017;91(8):2865-2877.
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-017-1932-y · PubMed
Gohil K, Bluschke A, Roessner V, Stock AK, Beste C. Psychological medicine. 2017;47(10):1771-1783.
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291717000216 · PubMed
Bluschke A, Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Roessner V, Beste C. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017;11:329.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00329 · PubMed
Bluschke A, von der Hagen M, Papenhagen K, Roessner V, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2017;7:43929.
DOI: 10.1038/srep43929 · PubMed
Bluschke A, von der Hagen M, Papenhagen K, Roessner V, Beste C. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2017;14:499-505.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.014 · PubMed
Brandt VC, Stock AK, Münchau A, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):7722.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08158-9 · PubMed
Beste C, Mückschel M, Rosales R, Domingo A, et al.. Brain structure & function. 2017;222(8):3807-3817.
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1435-x · PubMed
Stock AK, Hoffmann S, Beste C. Addiction biology. 2017;22(5):1355-1365.
DOI: 10.1111/adb.12412 · PubMed
Stock AK, Wolff N, Beste C. NeuroImage. 2017;162:117-126.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.066 · PubMed
Stock AK, Dajkic D, Köhling HL, von Heinegg EH, Fiedler M, Beste C. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):10170.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10926-6 · PubMed
Colzato LS, Sellaro R, Beste C. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. 2017;92:95-102.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.017 · PubMed